====== Request to inspect or copy Florida public records ====== **Florida · How do I request public records?** · state model checked by Claude · quality 1.00 //Generated by [[https://github.com/alibama/lexflow|lexflow]] from the state statutes (open-us-law, government publisher text) and checked by Claude: every quoted phrase was matched word for word against the statute text, and the process passed the BPMN/DMN schemas, bpmnlint and a Petri-net soundness check. Information, not legal advice.// **Governing law:** [[http://www.leg.state.fl.us/statutes/index.cfm?App_mode=Display_Statute&Search_String=&URL=0100-0199/0119/Sections/0119.07.html|Fla. Stat. § 119.07]] — 119.07 Inspection and copying of records; photographing public records; fees; exemptions. ===== Process map ===== Any person asks the custodian of a Florida state, county or municipal public record to inspect or copy it No response deadline: 119.07(1)(c) requires the custodian to acknowledge requests "promptly" and respond "in good faith" but sets no number of days, and these sections do not make silence a deemed denial, so no response step has a timer. The fixed periods in the text are the 30-day hold in (1)(h) and the 5-business-day pre-suit notice period in 119.12(1)(b); neither is a time limit for a response (see the record-hold and enforcement notes). The text sets no form for the request: it need not be written, and nothing here lets the custodian require the requester's name or purpose. A written request matters only for the 30-day hold in (1)(h) and the pre-suit notice in 119.12. Record hold (1)(h)-(i): even if the custodian says the record is not public, it may not be disposed of for 30 days after a written request, and if a civil action is filed within that period, only by court order after notice to all affected parties. This is a standing duty, not a step, and is not modelled as a timer. Designee (1)(b): the custodian may designate another officer or employee to handle inspection and copying but must disclose the designee's identity to the requester; this optional step is folded into the custodian lane. Exemption paths: state_basis is the unconditional (1)(e) duty whenever all or part of the record is claimed exempt. The written statement with particularity under (1)(f) is due only if the requester asks (condition reasons_requested) and is an optional branch: redaction and production of the remainder under (1)(d) follow state_basis directly (partly_exempt) and do not wait for it. Exclusive choices after the response: after state_basis (or the optional written reasons) the flow goes to produce_remainder (partly_exempt), give_notice (refusal_contested) or record_withheld (refusal_accepted); after a partial release, the requester takes copies, inspects only, or contests. A requester who both takes the released part and sues over the redaction follows only one of those paths in the diagram; in law both can happen. Contesting a refusal: give_notice can follow the response itself (for example a contested 'no record located' answer), the exemption statement, the written reasons, or a partial release, since 119.12(1)(a) covers any unlawful refusal to permit inspection or copying. A request the custodian simply ignores is not shown, because these sections attach no event or timer to silence. Enforcement (119.12): written notice at least 5 business days before suit is a condition of a fee award, not of the right to sue, and it is excused under 119.12(2) when the agency does not prominently post its custodian's contact information in its primary administrative building and on its website. The notice period begins on the day the custodian receives the notice, excludes Saturday, Sunday and legal holidays, and must run out before suit is filed. It is a minimum wait, not a time limit to act within, so it is not attached as a timer: the schema's deadlines model time limits whose expiry ends or redirects the flow, and a timer on give_notice or file_suit would wrongly show the right lapsing once 5 business days pass. Suing before the period ends, or without notice, can still produce an order under 119.07(1)(g) but no fee award; the model always routes through give_notice and does not show the excused or no-notice path. Court ruling: order_production follows 119.07(1)(g). In camera inspection is mandatory for the exemptions listed in (1)(g) and discretionary for 119.071(2)(c); it is not a separate step. On either ruling the court must then determine improper purpose under 119.12(3) (determine_purpose). The branches after it are award_costs when fee_award_due (the court found an unlawful refusal under 119.12(1)(a), notice was given or excused, and there was no improper purpose); costs_to_agency when improper_purpose, which bars a fee award to the complainant and can follow either ruling; and exemption_upheld when the exemption applies and the purpose was proper. When an improper purpose is found after a production order, the order still stands although the end event names only the cost award. 119.12(4) bars money damages. Fees (4): inspection itself carries no fee in this text, but the special service charge in (4)(d) applies to records 'requested to be inspected or copied', so it can arise on inspection-only requests; the model applies it only on the copy path. County maps and aerial photographs (4)(b), and photographing records under (3) and (4)(e), are not modelled. Electronic records: 119.01(2)(f) requires a copy in the medium requested if the agency keeps the record in that medium, with fees under 119.07(4) for unusual media or programming; remote electronic access under 119.07(2) is optional. These shape furnish_copies but are not separate steps. An agency may not answer a request by suing the requester for declaratory relief on whether the record is public or exempt (119.07(9)). Ballot inspection (5), auditor access (6) and criminal discovery (8) are special cases not modelled. start submit_request acknowledge search respond permit_access state_basis written_reasons produce_remainder assess_fee pay_fee furnish_copies give_notice file_suit order_production determine_purpose award_costs record_not_found records_inspected copies_furnished record_withheld exemption_upheld costs_awarded costs_to_agency produce_remainder_join assess_fee_join give_notice_join determine_purpose_join records_inspected_join record_withheld_join respond_gw state_basis_gw written_reasons_gw permit_access_gw produce_remainder_gw file_suit_gw determine_purpose_gw Fla. Stat. § 119.01(1): “all state, county, and municipal records are open for personal inspection and copying by any person” all state, county, and municipal records are open for personal inspection and copying by any person sf7 Fla. Stat. § 119.07(1)(a): “Every person who has custody of a public record shall permit the record to be inspected and copied by any person desiring to do so” Every person who has custody of a public record shall permit the record to be inspected and copied by any person desiring to do so sf7 sf8 Fla. Stat. § 119.07(1)(c): “must acknowledge requests to inspect or copy records promptly” must acknowledge requests to inspect or copy records promptly sf8 sf9 Fla. Stat. § 119.07(1)(c): “making reasonable efforts to determine from other officers or employees within the agency whether such a record exists and, if so, the location at which the record can be accessed” making reasonable efforts to determine from other officers or employees within the agency whether such a record exists and, if so, the location at which the record can be accessed sf9 sf10 Fla. Stat. § 119.07(1)(c): “respond to such requests in good faith” respond to such requests in good faith access_response sf10 sf11 Fla. Stat. § 119.07(1)(a): “at any reasonable time, under reasonable conditions, and under supervision by the custodian of the public records” at any reasonable time, under reasonable conditions, and under supervision by the custodian of the public records sf12 sf25 Fla. Stat. § 119.07(1)(e): “he or she shall state the basis of the exemption that he or she contends is applicable to the record, including the statutory citation to an exemption created or afforded by statute” he or she shall state the basis of the exemption that he or she contends is applicable to the record, including the statutory citation to an exemption created or afforded by statute sf13 sf16 Fla. Stat. § 119.07(1)(f): “If requested by the person seeking to inspect or copy the record, the custodian of public records shall state in writing and with particularity the reasons for the conclusion that the record is exempt or confidential.” If requested by the person seeking to inspect or copy the record, the custodian of public records shall state in writing and with particularity the reasons for the conclusion that the record is exempt or confidential. sf17 sf21 Fla. Stat. § 119.07(1)(d): “shall redact that portion of the record to which an exemption has been asserted and validly applies, and such person shall produce the remainder of such record for inspection and copying” shall redact that portion of the record to which an exemption has been asserted and validly applies, and such person shall produce the remainder of such record for inspection and copying sf1 sf28 Fla. Stat. § 119.07(4): “If a fee is not prescribed by law, the following fees are authorized” If a fee is not prescribed by law, the following fees are authorized copy_fee sf2 sf32 Fla. Stat. § 119.07(4): “upon payment of the fee prescribed by law” upon payment of the fee prescribed by law sf32 sf33 Fla. Stat. § 119.07(4): “The custodian of public records shall furnish a copy or a certified copy of the record” The custodian of public records shall furnish a copy or a certified copy of the record sf33 sf43 Fla. Stat. § 119.12(1)(b): “The complainant provided written notice identifying the public record request to the agency’s custodian of public records at least 5 business days before filing the civil action” The complainant provided written notice identifying the public record request to the agency’s custodian of public records at least 5 business days before filing the civil action sf3 sf34 Fla. Stat. § 119.12(1): “If a civil action is filed against an agency to enforce the provisions of this chapter” If a civil action is filed against an agency to enforce the provisions of this chapter sf34 sf35 Fla. Stat. § 119.07(1)(g): “If the court finds that the asserted exemption is not applicable, it shall order the public record or part thereof in question to be immediately produced for inspection or copying as requested by the person seeking such access.” If the court finds that the asserted exemption is not applicable, it shall order the public record or part thereof in question to be immediately produced for inspection or copying as requested by the person seeking such access. sf36 sf38 Fla. Stat. § 119.12(3): “The court shall determine whether the complainant requested to inspect or copy a public record or participated in the civil action for an improper purpose.” The court shall determine whether the complainant requested to inspect or copy a public record or participated in the civil action for an improper purpose. sf4 sf39 Fla. Stat. § 119.12(1): “the court shall assess and award the reasonable costs of enforcement, including reasonable attorney fees, against the responsible agency if the court determines that: (a) The agency unlawfully refused to permit a public record to be inspected or copied” the court shall assess and award the reasonable costs of enforcement, including reasonable attorney fees, against the responsible agency if the court determines that: (a) The agency unlawfully refused to permit a public record to be inspected or copied sf40 sf44 Fla. Stat. § 119.07(1)(c): “A good faith response includes making reasonable efforts to determine from other officers or employees within the agency whether such a record exists” A good faith response includes making reasonable efforts to determine from other officers or employees within the agency whether such a record exists sf15 Fla. Stat. § 119.07(1)(a): “shall permit the record to be inspected and copied” shall permit the record to be inspected and copied sf5 Fla. Stat. § 119.07(4): “furnish a copy or a certified copy of the record upon payment of the fee prescribed by law” furnish a copy or a certified copy of the record upon payment of the fee prescribed by law sf43 Fla. Stat. § 119.07(1)(e): “contends that all or part of the record is exempt from inspection and copying” contends that all or part of the record is exempt from inspection and copying sf6 Fla. Stat. § 119.07(1)(g): “the public record or part thereof in question shall be submitted to the court for an inspection in camera” the public record or part thereof in question shall be submitted to the court for an inspection in camera sf41 Fla. Stat. § 119.12(1): “the reasonable costs of enforcement, including reasonable attorney fees” the reasonable costs of enforcement, including reasonable attorney fees sf44 Fla. Stat. § 119.12(3): “shall assess and award against the complainant and to the agency the reasonable costs, including reasonable attorney fees, incurred by the agency in responding to the civil action” shall assess and award against the complainant and to the agency the reasonable costs, including reasonable attorney fees, incurred by the agency in responding to the civil action sf42 sf18 sf22 sf1 sf26 sf29 sf2 sf14 sf19 sf23 sf30 sf3 sf37 sf38 sf4 sf27 sf31 sf5 sf20 sf24 sf6 sf11 sf12 sf13 sf14 sf15 sf16 sf17 sf18 sf19 sf20 sf21 sf22 sf23 sf24 sf25 sf26 sf27 sf28 sf29 sf30 sf31 sf35 sf36 sf37 sf39 sf40 sf41 sf42 no_exemption exemption_asserted refusal_contested record_not_found reasons_requested partly_exempt refusal_contested refusal_accepted partly_exempt refusal_contested refusal_accepted copies_requested inspection_only copies_requested refusal_contested inspection_only exemption_not_applicable fee_award_due exemption_applies improper_purpose ===== Steps and the words they come from ===== - **Ask custodian to inspect or copy record** — Requester (any person) · //right// (§ 119.07(1)(a)) \\ “//Every person who has custody of a public record shall permit the record to be inspected and copied by any person desiring to do so//” - **Acknowledge the request promptly** — Custodian of public records (or designee) · //obligation// (§ 119.07(1)%%(c)%%) \\ “//must acknowledge requests to inspect or copy records promptly//” - **Ask agency staff whether record exists** — Custodian of public records (or designee) · //obligation// (§ 119.07(1)%%(c)%%) \\ “//making reasonable efforts to determine from other officers or employees within the agency whether such a record exists and, if so, the location at which the record can be accessed//” - **Respond to the request in good faith** — Custodian of public records (or designee) · //obligation// (§ 119.07(1)%%(c)%%) \\ “//respond to such requests in good faith//” - **Permit inspection and copying under supervision** — Custodian of public records (or designee) · //obligation// (§ 119.07(1)(a)) \\ “//at any reasonable time, under reasonable conditions, and under supervision by the custodian of the public records//” - **State exemption basis and statutory citation** — Custodian of public records (or designee) · //obligation// (§ 119.07(1)(e)) \\ “//he or she shall state the basis of the exemption that he or she contends is applicable to the record, including the statutory citation to an exemption created or afforded by statute//” - **Give written reasons with particularity** — Custodian of public records (or designee) · //obligation// (§ 119.07(1)(f)) \\ “//If requested by the person seeking to inspect or copy the record, the custodian of public records shall state in writing and with particularity the reasons for the conclusion that the record is exempt or confidential.//” - **Redact exempt part; produce the remainder** — Custodian of public records (or designee) · //obligation// (§ 119.07(1)(d)) \\ “//shall redact that portion of the record to which an exemption has been asserted and validly applies, and such person shall produce the remainder of such record for inspection and copying//” - **Determine the fee for the copies** — Custodian of public records (or designee) · //permission// (§ 119.07(4)) \\ “//If a fee is not prescribed by law, the following fees are authorized//” - **Pay the fee for the copies** — Requester (any person) · //obligation// (§ 119.07(4)) \\ “//upon payment of the fee prescribed by law//” - **Furnish a copy or certified copy** — Custodian of public records (or designee) · //obligation// (§ 119.07(4)) \\ “//The custodian of public records shall furnish a copy or a certified copy of the record//” - **Give custodian written notice before suing** — Requester (any person) · //permission// (§ 119.12(1)(b)) \\ “//The complainant provided written notice identifying the public record request to the agency’s custodian of public records at least 5 business days before filing the civil action//” - **File civil action to enforce the chapter** — Requester (any person) · //right// (§ 119.12(1)) \\ “//If a civil action is filed against an agency to enforce the provisions of this chapter//” - **Order immediate production of the record** — Court (civil enforcement action) · //obligation// (§ 119.07(1)(g)) \\ “//If the court finds that the asserted exemption is not applicable, it shall order the public record or part thereof in question to be immediately produced for inspection or copying as requested by the person seeking such access.//” - **Determine whether purpose was improper** — Court (civil enforcement action) · //obligation// (§ 119.12(3)) \\ “//The court shall determine whether the complainant requested to inspect or copy a public record or participated in the civil action for an improper purpose.//” - **Award enforcement costs and attorney fees** — Court (civil enforcement action) · //obligation// (§ 119.12(1)) \\ “//the court shall assess and award the reasonable costs of enforcement, including reasonable attorney fees, against the responsible agency if the court determines that: (a) The agency unlawfully refused to permit a public record to be inspected or copied//” ===== How does the custodian respond to the request? ===== Decision table (DMN), hit policy FIRST. ^ A good-faith search finds the record ^ The whole record is claimed exempt ^ Part of the record is claimed exempt ^ → Response ^ → No record located ^ → Record open in full ^ → An exemption is asserted ^ → Only part is withheld ^ Source ^ | false | - | - | No record located after a good-faith search | true | false | false | false | § 119.07(1)(c) | | true | true | - | Withhold the record; state the exemption and its statutory citation | false | false | true | false | § 119.07(1)(e) | | true | false | true | Redact the exempt portion, produce the remainder, state the exemption | false | false | true | true | § 119.07(1)(d) | | true | false | false | Permit inspection and copying | false | true | false | false | § 119.07(1)(a) | ===== What may the custodian charge for the copies? ===== Decision table (DMN), hit policy FIRST. ^ Another law prescribes the fee ^ Request needs extensive IT or staff assistance ^ Kind of copy ^ → Authorized fee ^ Source ^ | true | - | - | The fee prescribed by law | § 119.07(4) | | false | true | - | Actual cost of duplication plus a reasonable special service charge | § 119.07(4)(d) | | false | false | certified | Up to $1 per certified copy | § 119.07(4)(c) | | false | false | one-sided | Up to 15 cents per one-sided copy up to 14 x 8.5 inches | § 119.07(4)(a)(1) | | false | false | two-sided | Up to 15 cents plus no more than 5 cents more per two-sided copy | § 119.07(4)(a)(2) | | false | false | other | Actual cost of duplication | § 119.07(4)(a)(3) | ===== What the text leaves open ===== * No response deadline: 119.07(1)%%(c)%% requires the custodian to acknowledge requests "promptly" and respond "in good faith" but sets no number of days, and these sections do not make silence a deemed denial, so no response step has a timer. The fixed periods in the text are the 30-day hold in (1)(h) and the 5-business-day pre-suit notice period in 119.12(1)(b); neither is a time limit for a response (see the record-hold and enforcement notes). * The text sets no form for the request: it need not be written, and nothing here lets the custodian require the requester's name or purpose. A written request matters only for the 30-day hold in (1)(h) and the pre-suit notice in 119.12. * Record hold (1)(h)-(i): even if the custodian says the record is not public, it may not be disposed of for 30 days after a written request, and if a civil action is filed within that period, only by court order after notice to all affected parties. This is a standing duty, not a step, and is not modelled as a timer. * Designee (1)(b): the custodian may designate another officer or employee to handle inspection and copying but must disclose the designee's identity to the requester; this optional step is folded into the custodian lane. * Exemption paths: state_basis is the unconditional (1)(e) duty whenever all or part of the record is claimed exempt. The written statement with particularity under (1)(f) is due only if the requester asks (condition reasons_requested) and is an optional branch: redaction and production of the remainder under (1)(d) follow state_basis directly (partly_exempt) and do not wait for it. * Exclusive choices after the response: after state_basis (or the optional written reasons) the flow goes to produce_remainder (partly_exempt), give_notice (refusal_contested) or record_withheld (refusal_accepted); after a partial release, the requester takes copies, inspects only, or contests. A requester who both takes the released part and sues over the redaction follows only one of those paths in the diagram; in law both can happen. * Contesting a refusal: give_notice can follow the response itself (for example a contested 'no record located' answer), the exemption statement, the written reasons, or a partial release, since 119.12(1)(a) covers any unlawful refusal to permit inspection or copying. A request the custodian simply ignores is not shown, because these sections attach no event or timer to silence. * Enforcement (119.12): written notice at least 5 business days before suit is a condition of a fee award, not of the right to sue, and it is excused under 119.12(2) when the agency does not prominently post its custodian's contact information in its primary administrative building and on its website. The notice period begins on the day the custodian receives the notice, excludes Saturday, Sunday and legal holidays, and must run out before suit is filed. It is a minimum wait, not a time limit to act within, so it is not attached as a timer: the schema's deadlines model time limits whose expiry ends or redirects the flow, and a timer on give_notice or file_suit would wrongly show the right lapsing once 5 business days pass. Suing before the period ends, or without notice, can still produce an order under 119.07(1)(g) but no fee award; the model always routes through give_notice and does not show the excused or no-notice path. * Court ruling: order_production follows 119.07(1)(g). In camera inspection is mandatory for the exemptions listed in (1)(g) and discretionary for 119.071(2)%%(c)%%; it is not a separate step. On either ruling the court must then determine improper purpose under 119.12(3) (determine_purpose). The branches after it are award_costs when fee_award_due (the court found an unlawful refusal under 119.12(1)(a), notice was given or excused, and there was no improper purpose); costs_to_agency when improper_purpose, which bars a fee award to the complainant and can follow either ruling; and exemption_upheld when the exemption applies and the purpose was proper. When an improper purpose is found after a production order, the order still stands although the end event names only the cost award. 119.12(4) bars money damages. * Fees (4): inspection itself carries no fee in this text, but the special service charge in (4)(d) applies to records 'requested to be inspected or copied', so it can arise on inspection-only requests; the model applies it only on the copy path. County maps and aerial photographs (4)(b), and photographing records under (3) and (4)(e), are not modelled. * Electronic records: 119.01(2)(f) requires a copy in the medium requested if the agency keeps the record in that medium, with fees under 119.07(4) for unusual media or programming; remote electronic access under 119.07(2) is optional. These shape furnish_copies but are not separate steps. * An agency may not answer a request by suing the requester for declaratory relief on whether the record is public or exempt (119.07(9)). Ballot inspection (5), auditor access (6) and criminal discovery (8) are special cases not modelled. ===== Court decisions citing this law ===== //Found with [[https://www.courtlistener.com|CourtListener]] (Free Law Project): opinions in the state's appellate courts whose text cites these sections. Listed for research; not every citing case construes the section.// * [[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/4989615/rhea-v-district-board-of-trustees/|Rhea v. District Board of Trustees]] (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2013, 109 So. 3d 851; 2013 WL 950544; 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 4073) — cites § 119.01 * [[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/1928910/mazer-v-orange-county/|Mazer v. Orange County]] (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002, 811 So. 2d 857; 2002 WL 463693) — cites § 119.12 * [[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/3194234/board-of-trustees-jacksonville-police-fire-pension-fund-etc-v-curtis/|Board of Trustees, Jacksonville Police & Fire Pension Fund, etc. v. Curtis W. Lee]] (Supreme Court of Florida, 2016, 189 So. 3d 120; 41 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 146; 44 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 1769; 2016 Fla. LEXIS 783; 2016 WL 1458515) — cites § 119.01 * [[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/3194234/board-of-trustees-jacksonville-police-fire-pension-fund-etc-v-curtis/|Board of Trustees, Jacksonville Police & Fire Pension Fund, etc. v. Curtis W. Lee]] (Supreme Court of Florida, 2016, 189 So. 3d 120; 41 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 146; 44 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 1769; 2016 Fla. LEXIS 783; 2016 WL 1458515) — cites § 119.07 * [[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/3194234/board-of-trustees-jacksonville-police-fire-pension-fund-etc-v-curtis/|Board of Trustees, Jacksonville Police & Fire Pension Fund, etc. v. Curtis W. Lee]] (Supreme Court of Florida, 2016, 189 So. 3d 120; 41 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 146; 44 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 1769; 2016 Fla. LEXIS 783; 2016 WL 1458515) — cites § 119.12 * [[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/1655847/woodfaulk-v-state/|Woodfaulk v. State]] (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006, 935 So. 2d 1225; 2006 WL 2347321) — cites § 119.12 * [[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/4406453/florida-agency-for-health-care-administration-v-zuckerman-spaeder-llp/|Florida Agency For Health Care Administration v. Zuckerman Spaeder, LLP]] (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2017, 221 So. 3d 1260; 2017 WL 2870998; 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 9660) — cites § 119.07 * [[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/5002260/promenade-diberville-llc-v-sundy/|Promenade D'Iberville, LLC v. Sundy]] (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2014, 145 So. 3d 980; 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 13387; 2014 WL 4242961) — cites § 119.01 * [[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/5002260/promenade-diberville-llc-v-sundy/|Promenade D'Iberville, LLC v. Sundy]] (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2014, 145 So. 3d 980; 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 13387; 2014 WL 4242961) — cites § 119.07 * [[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/5002260/promenade-diberville-llc-v-sundy/|Promenade D'Iberville, LLC v. Sundy]] (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2014, 145 So. 3d 980; 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 13387; 2014 WL 4242961) — cites § 119.12 * [[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/5000856/chandler-v-city-of-greenacres/|Chandler v. City of Greenacres]] (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2014, 140 So. 3d 1080; 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 8861; 2014 WL 2589180) — cites § 119.07 * [[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/2490916/johnson-v-jarvis/|Johnson v. Jarvis]] (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011, 74 So. 3d 168; 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 18128; 2011 WL 5560679) — cites § 119.12 * [[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/1782156/office-of-state-attorney-v-gonzalez/|Office of State Attorney v. Gonzalez]] (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2007, 953 So. 2d 759; 2007 WL 1159708) — cites § 119.12 * [[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/1669640/tampa-medical-assocs-v-estate-of-torres/|TAMPA MEDICAL ASSOCS. v. Estate of Torres]] (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005, 903 So. 2d 259; 2005 WL 1225437) — cites § 119.01 * [[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/1843444/johnson-v-butterworth/|Johnson v. Butterworth]] (Supreme Court of Florida, 1998, 713 So. 2d 985; 1998 WL 378355) — cites § 119.01 * [[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/4998888/grapski-v-city-of-alachua/|Grapski v. City of Alachua]] (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2012, 134 So. 3d 987; 2012 WL 1448503; 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 6630) — cites § 119.12 * [[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/1571097/rameses-inc-v-demings/|Rameses, Inc. v. Demings]] (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2010, 29 So. 3d 418; 38 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 1559; 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 2867; 2010 WL 742578) — cites § 119.01 * [[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/7697159/state-v-wooten/|State v. Wooten]] (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2018, 260 So. 3d 1060) — cites § 119.07 * [[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/3200416/herbits-v-city-of-miami/|Herbits v. City of Miami]] (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2016, 197 So. 3d 575; 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 6768; 2016 WL 2339866) — cites § 119.12 * [[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/4390762/national-council-on-compensation-insurance-florida-office-of-insurance/|National Council on Compensation Insurance, Florida Office of Insurance Regulation, and David Altmaier, in his official capacity as Commissioner of the Florida Office of Insurance Regulation v. James F. Fee Jr., Individually]] (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2017, 219 So. 3d 172; 2017 WL 1908370; 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 6518) — cites § 119.07 ===== Checks ===== * Quotes checked word for word: 34 (0 not exact) * BPMN / DMN schema errors: 0 / 0; bpmnlint errors: 0 * Petri nets sound: 1 of 1 * Sections used: 119.07, 119.01, 119.12 ← [[lexflow:fl|Florida]] · [[lexflow:start|lexflow models]]